Since plaintiff isnt an authorities formal otherwise personnel, and since defendants failed to file encumbrances up against the debated possessions since retribution to own official governmental requirements, plaintiff usually do not county a statutory allege to own invalid burden.
As stated in the Opinion, the fact that these documents were recorded in Lane County does not establish that they were in anyway invalid. Opinion at 21. Plaintiff does not explain how these documents are «defective»; as such, plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief because she dose not allege «sufficient . . . underlying facts» in support of her claim. Starr, 652 F.3d at 1216.
Moreover, plaintiff’s assertion that defendants had knowledge of the allegedly invalid encumbrances «because they each had persons in their employ who . . . create[d] fictitious documents» is similarly vague and conclusory. Thus, plaintiff is again merely asserting the elements of a claim, without identifying any particular facts entitling her to relief. Discover Or. Rev. Stat. («[a]ny person who knowingly files, or directs another to file, an invalid claim of encumbrance shall be liable to the owner of the property»).